(Robert
Kahn's take on yesterday's announced decision by Judge Hanen)
A
Texas judge's injunction against
President Obama's executive orders on immigration will be overturned promptly
by the 5th Circuit.
U.S.
District Judge Andrew Hanen, a right-wing appointee of President George W.
Bush, let his animus against Obama and immigrants prejudice his judgment.
Hanen
knows nothing about how immigration policy has been conducted for centuries -
or he doesn't care to know it.
Any
district director of U.S. immigration services has the power to do what
President Obama did.
A
district director for Immigration and Customs Enforcement has the power to
admit immigrants into the United States on a whim.
He
or she can set them free on no bond, or imprison them under any bond he
chooses.
He
can give them work permits, or not; let them travel out of his district, or
not; charge them criminally or not; order them sent to a deportation hearing
immediately or put it off indefinitely. He can do this because of where they
came from, or their religion, or because they entered the United States in one
place instead of 10 miles up the river.
And
the ICE boss in the adjoining district can enforce opposite policies on every
point.
Neither
Texas, nor the 25 other Republican-controlled states that shopped for judges
before suing the Obama administration in Brownsville, Texas, would dream of
suing an ICE district director for this.
Because
that's the way it's always been done.
I
did legal work in U.S. immigration prisons for years. I wrote the first history
of U.S. immigration prisons. The situation has not changed one bit since my
book came out 19 years ago.
ICE
district directors have immense powers, some of which I've described. An ICE
deportation officer has virtually the same powers, though deportation officers
are civil servants a mere GS step or two above a Border Patrolman, but
unelected - as are ICE district directors.
Since
1980, district directors for ICE, and its predecessor the INS, have done these
things:
- Ordered refugees of war to be imprisoned in one Border Patrol district, but let them go 10 miles away;
- Set bonds at $7,500 in one district and at $1,500, or nothing, in an adjoining one;
- Given work permits and indefinitely postponed deportation hearings for Nicaraguans, but denied work permits and ordered immediate deportation hearings for Salvadorans;
- Ordered every border-crosser in their district locked up, then let them all go, then ordered them all locked up again;
- Allowed refugees of war to be tortured in U.S. immigration prisons.
- Ordered refugees of war to be imprisoned in one Border Patrol district, but let them go 10 miles away;
- Set bonds at $7,500 in one district and at $1,500, or nothing, in an adjoining one;
- Given work permits and indefinitely postponed deportation hearings for Nicaraguans, but denied work permits and ordered immediate deportation hearings for Salvadorans;
- Ordered every border-crosser in their district locked up, then let them all go, then ordered them all locked up again;
- Allowed refugees of war to be tortured in U.S. immigration prisons.
Most
of these peculiar orders were approved, or ordered, by the U.S. attorney general.
An INS or ICE district director who bucked the attorney general on Monday would
be looking for a job Tuesday.
All
of these contradictory, often cruel, policies were actions of the executive
branch.
Congress
never complained, effectively, nor did the glorious state of Texas, the lead
plaintiff in the lawsuit against the Obama administration - Texas, where
3-year-old babies were strip-searched because their mother asked to talk to a
lawyer.
What
were those babies hiding in their vaginas?
I saw a deportation officer raise the bond of a Salvadoran torture victim from
$1,500 to $3,000 when my co-worker, a nun, tried to bond him out.
Sister
Suzanne raised another $1,500, and when she went to bond out her client the
deportation officer raised her to $5,000.
Sister
Suzanne wrinkled her nose - a nun's protest - then got other nuns involved, and
she got her client out.
This
is the way the U.S. immigration system is run: on whims and vindictiveness. On
orders from the Executive Branch, and whatever the district director says next.
To
claim that the president of the United States has "exceeded his
powers," by doing no more than any ICE district director does every day,
is utter balderdash.
Now
Speaker of the House John Boehner has threatened to kill funding for the
Department of Homeland Security unless the president rescinds his order
protecting millions of people who were brought to our country as children, and
graduated from schools, and lived honestly, and can prove it.
Boehner's
proposal is vile, dishonest and racist - not just because it is a naked appeal
to his party's voters - but because it ignores the way U.S. immigration policy
is conducted, and has been conducted forever.
Surely
Boehner, as Speaker of the House, knows this. He has access to this
information.
The
only reason Boehner and his party can do this is because 99.9% of the U.S.
people do not understand how our immigration services are run, and always have
been.
Boehner
and his party are bathed with blood, dancing upon corpses, willing to shut down
funding for U.S. counterterrorism operations around the globe, to gain a few
political points.
None dare call it
sanity.Robert Kahn's book, "Other People's Blood: U.S. Immigration Prisons in the Reagan Decade," was published by Westview Press/HarperCollins in 1996. His views do not represent the views of Courthouse News Service.
No comments:
Post a Comment